![](http://www.axisglobe.com/Image/2005/08/31/India/President%20Bush%20and%20Indian%20Prime%20Minister%20Manmohan%20SinghJuly%2018%202005.jpg)
A confidence vote came to parliament (which could have ousted the Prime Minister and forced a new parliamentary coalition to form) when the Communist party left the coalition over the US deal (citing something about imperialism on their way out the door), and Singh's future--as well as the deal itself--hung in the balance.
Congress won by a small margin. But accusations of bribery are rampant, opened flamboyantly by a BJH
![](http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44855000/jpg/_44855388_papersss226.jpg)
From here, the deal has only a few months to be approved by the IAEA and the US Congress, before Bush leaves office. The move would be a jab in the opposite direction of the US' typical anti-proliferation strategy. India's development of a nuclear bomb made it--according to the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty--a nuclear rogue state (along with Pakistan, maybe Israel), and the US has not required India to give up its weapons program for help in its peacful nuclear program. Surprisingly, Europe is not making a great fuss about this--possibly because Europe's diplomatic leadership are Brown and Sarkozy, and possibly because Europe wants to see a strong India counter a strong China. If Bush keeps Europe's support, the deal is likely to sqeak through before he leaves office.
But the bitterness left in the throats of Indians will not be forgotten quickly. The Opposition will try to use bribery allegations as a sign that the US is trying to use India as a pawn. If the Indian public takes these allegations to heart, the US is going to struggle keeping India along as an ally in the near future.
That said, the way the world is taking a liking to Mr. Obama, they may quickly change their mind if he becomes president.
No comments:
Post a Comment